SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Social media companies will be making public their policies for removing problem content and giving detailed accounts of how and when they remove it, under a proposal being considered by California legislators who blame online chatter for encouraging violence and undermining democracy.
The bipartisan measure stalled last year over free speech concerns, but Democratic Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel said Tuesday he hopes to revise his bill by adding amendments he said would make it clear that lawmakers would not intend to censor or regulate content.
But his bill would require companies to say how they regulate their own content under their social media terms of service.
“We think we’ve found a way to thread that needle,” Gabriel said during a news conference promoting what he called the first-of-its-kind legislation. “We’re not telling you what to do – but tell policymakers and the public what you are doing.”
“There is nothing in this bill that requires companies to censor speech,” he added. “There is nothing that requires them to silence certain voices or amplify other content. It simply requires them to be honest and transparent about certain voices when they are amplifying and when they are silencing others. “
The digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit promoting free expression online, was among those opposing the bill on free speech grounds. But the group said it couldn’t say if Gabriel addressed those concerns until he amended his bill.
The proposal sailed through the state assembly more than a year ago on a 64-1 vote, then to a ground in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It faces a critical hearing that the committee will move its bills to the Senate next week, days before the deadline.
The California Chamber of Commerce opposes the bill along with trade groups including the Consumer Technology Association, Internet Association, Internet Coalition, Netchoice and TechNet.
The bill requires such complete disclosure that it would provide “bad actors with roadmaps to get around our protections,” a coalition of opponents told lawmakers. A detailed quarterly report of its requirement to the state attorney general is “unworkable and unreasonable,” even with proposed amendments, the coalition said.
And the enforcement is under the bill is “onerous and problematic,” a report of filings on possible civil penalties and investigations by subjecting companies. The potential for lawsuits would be counterproductive, the groups said, and could be “suppressing ongoing efforts to protect users from harmful content online.”
Companies would be required to say if their policies cover various categories of online content and if so, how they enforce those policies in each category, how quickly and how often, all broken down by how it was shared – for example by text, video or images General Chat Chat Lounge
Categories would include hate or racist speech; extremism or radicalization; disinformation or misinformation; harassment; and foreign political interference. They would say how many items were flagged, how many resulted in some action, and how often those items were viewed and shared.
“Consumers – all of us are looking at our social media feeds – deserve to know how social media is amplifying and spreading hate and misinformation and disinformation, and unfortunately even fomenting violence in our society,” said the Democratic Sen. Richard Pan, who heads the California Asian & Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus that has seen harassment grow during the coronavirus pandemic.
“They know what their algorithms do. We don’t know, “Pan added. “We need to know what’s going on inside that black box. We need to know what those billions of dollars they’ve invested in researching how we think actually drives the decisions they make. “
Gabriel said that as many social media companies call home, “California has a special obligation and lead to a special opportunity” at a time when federal politicians “can’t even agree what day of the week it is.”
Advocates and the companies themselves agree that whatever California does will become a model for the rest of the nation, as many of its other policies do, Gabriel said.
The bill is one of several addressing social media that are moving through the Legislature this year. Among them is one that would allow parents to sue social media platforms alleging harm to children who have become addicted to online content. Another would require online companies to meet certain standards if they market to childrenGeneral Chat Chat Lounge
Another would allow Californians to seek violent social media posts in a court order to have the posts removed.
General Chat Chat Lounge