Another congressman from Wisconsin is backing fair negotiations between local news providers and giant technology companies so journalists get paid for their work.
US Rep. Tom Tiffany, R-Minocqua, said last week he added his name as a cosponsor to the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act because several news outlets in his northern Wisconsin district could go out of business due to the predatory practices of Big Tech.
“For far too long, tech giants like Google and Facebook have hamstrung local news organizations with their monopolistic power,” Tiffany said in a statement to the State Journal. “The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act will give hardworking local reporters a level playing field and relief from Big Tech’s anticompetitive practices.”
He’s right. And more members of Wisconsin’s congressional delegation should get behind this important cause to preserve independent and professional reporting in their local communities.
People are also reading…
Tiffany joins Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Glenbeulah, and 75 other members of Congress in backing a level playing field for fair negotiations over how local news reports may be used and monetized by search engines and social media sites.
Supporters include 44 Democrats and 20 Republicans in the House, and seven Republicans and six Democrats in the Senate. That’s about as bipartisan as it gets. And a key Senate committee is expected to take up the proposal soon, advocates say. The Senate Judiciary Committee should recommend and send the bill to the full Senate for a vote, where Sens. Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, and Ron Johnson, R-Oshkosh, should be supportive.
The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act would let local news providers negotiate as a group with the biggest technology companies for up to four years. The temporary exemption from federal antitrust laws would give local news outlets more leverage to secure advertising revenue and better control how their stories are used by Google, Facebook and a handful of digital brokers.
Big Tech companies grab most of the revenue now, with a take-it-or-leave-it attitude towards news providers, even though local journalists are the ones producing much of the content these technology companies profit from. That’s not a free or fair market.
News publishers are gaining record audiences online. With so much unattributed and untrustworthy information on social media and shady online platforms, the public is seeking — and needs — credible information from local sources in their communities.
Yet many reliable outlets — including smaller newspapers in Tiffany’s northern Wisconsin district — are struggling to survive because Google and Facebook control so much of who gets to see what online, and how revenue from all that traffic is divided up.
Google and Facebook control the digital market and enjoy dictating the terms in their favor. But Americans are increasingly suspicious — with good reason — that these companies are unfairly distorting discussions, highlighting sensational claims, encouraging division, vacuuming up personal information and hurting our democracy.
The Journalism Competition and Protection Act would encourage the tech giants to negotiate in good faith over the value local journalism provides for their platforms, as well as how it appears and is prioritized. And instead of Big Tech snatching most of the advertising revenue, more could go back to newsrooms to pay for local news coverage.
Congress needs to act so market forces — not two companies — allow local journalism to be fairly compensated, hire more reporters and keep citizens informed.